Lawmakers continue to focus on bills aimed at sexual assault prevention in response to Larry Nassar. Nassar is the former doctor who told patients he was treating them, when he was actually sexually assaulting them.
But the new policy proposals have led to heated debate among lawmakers during a committee hearing.
One lawmaker had harsh words for a bill to increase documentation and record retention requirements for doctors for certain medical procedures, and make failure to do so a crime. Lawmakers in favor say a tighter reign on medical documentation would prevent a Nassar situation from happening again. But others say this isn’t the way to go about it.
“This whole criminalization, I’m opposed to the criminalization of your record keeping,” said Representative Rose Mary Robinson (D-Detroit). “I think it’s inane. I think it’s stupid.”
Medical professionals also expressed their concerns about the bills during a committee hearing Tuesday. They say doctors are reluctant to perform exams on sensitive parts of patients’ bodies.
Glenn Dregansky is a doctor in Kalamazoo who specializes in family medicine. He said some of the bills introduced could have a chilling effect on the medical profession.
“First we do no harm,” he said. “That’s that fundamental tenant of what we do, and a physician did harm under the guise of treatment. So I don’t know how to prevent that. I do know that I am scared to create an atmosphere where physicians are afraid to examine patients.”
Lawmakers also argued about sex education in schools during the Tuesday committee meeting.
A bill would require sex education for 11thand 12thgraders to include instruction on sexual assault and healthy relationships.
Representative Martin Howrylak (R-Troy) said the bill makes a moral judgement that should be up to parents about what is okay in a dating relationship.
Bill sponsor Kim LaSata (R-Bainbridge Township) disagrees. She said kids aren’t always being taught healthy relationships at home, and this would help the students understand abuse.
The two had a heated exchange during the committee hearing.
“I am telling you that you are adding something in here with my tax dollars that could potentially be in violation of what I believe is morally right,” said Howrylak.
LaSata responded, “Then opt out.”
“Well then don’t take my tax dollars,” said Howrylak. “Or maybe you could fix your bill and stop arguing with me.”