© 2024 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Public Media from Michigan State University
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Court of Appeals upholds dismissal of charges against ex-MSU President

Former Michigan State University President Lou Anna K. Simon appears at a Senate subcommittee hearing in 2018.
Screen shot from C-SPAN
Screen shot from C-SPAN
Former Michigan State University President Lou Anna K. Simon appears at a Senate subcommittee hearing in 2018.

The state Court of Appeals is upholding a lower court’s decision to throw out charges against former Michigan State University President Lou Anna K. Simon.

Simon faced charges that she lied to police during the investigation into sexual abuse by former gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar.

The charges were dismissed by a lower court for lack of evidence. Now, the appeals court is affirming that decision.

Attorney John Manly represents some of Nassar’s survivors. He said a jury should decide whether Simon was lying—not the Court of Appeals.

“And the message this is sending, albeit unintentionally—perhaps—is that when powerful people at powerful institutions allow horrible things to happen to people, that we’re not going to hold them accountable,” Manly said.

The state attorney general’s office is deciding whether to appeal the decision.

““The evidence presented against President Simon established probable cause for the crimes charged. The Department followed the evidence where it led. Any claim otherwise is unfounded. We are confident in the integrity of the charges against the defendant and are reviewing appellate options in our continued fight for the survivors,” a spokesperson for the Department of Attorney General said in a written statement.

The Court of Appeals also overturned a conviction for former MSU gymnastics coach Kathie Klages.

She had also been charged with misleading investigators when she said she didn’t recall a past conversation where she allegedly learned of Nassar’s abuse in the 1997.

Attorney Mary Chartier represents Klages. She said the trial turned into an attempt to hold her client accountable for Nassar’s crimes.

“Anyone who sat through the trial and was able to objectively look at the evidence against Mrs. Klages has to admit that the attorney general put forth absolutely no evidence that Mrs. Klages lied to the police,” Chartier said.

The state is looking at appealing the Court of Appeals decision in her case as well.

Journalism at this station is made possible by donors who value local reporting. Donate today to keep stories like this one coming. It is thanks to your generosity that we can keep this content free and accessible for everyone. Thanks!